Re: how to control how often smartd-runner fires.
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:08:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============0891810546121887427== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ajirp3x7mcOAcLdFXUpwC78OqT5VumewF" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ajirp3x7mcOAcLdFXUpwC78OqT5VumewF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CVWqkwUUCGXx3FtmwwiBfH3ODsERu99ql"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [smartmontools-support] how to control how often smartd-runner fires. References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> --CVWqkwUUCGXx3FtmwwiBfH3ODsERu99ql Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-01-19 19:25, Ray Andrews wrote: > On 19/01/17 09:51 AM, mathog wrote: >> but I don't think that badblocks has that ability. Nor does smartctl >> have a nondestructive read then write mode. Somebody please correct m= e >> if I'm wrong on that point. On the other hand, if you see pending >> sectors on a RAID disk, you're probably going to want to replace it >> right away in any case. > But you'd think that some whipper-snapper ace would write something. =20 > Just from what I read at that link posted yesterday it sounded like it = > might even be scriptable. Not that simple. Remember that smartctl doesn't do any testing; it is the hard disk itself, via its local cpu and "bios" and memory which does the real thing. smartctl /simply/ triggers it, and later reads the logs to find out what was the result. In this context, we can guess that the hard disk keeps somewhere a list of the current bad blocks. That somewhere is not standardized (this is an eduicated guess of mine); apparently we only have access via SMART to read the number of bad sectors pending realocation. > And you'd also think that there'd be a=20 > utility that let you know which files were effected so that you could d= o=20 > something about it. No, this is also difficult. If the functionality exists at all it depends on the filesystem type. Consider that the filesystem keeps an easy to search for filename (and path), somehow, very fast. Once you have the entry for the filename, you get also some sort of table or list of the sectors or records where that file is stored. This is a very fast and optimized operation. If you want the reverse, you have to scan all directory entries and all tables/lists of record locations, one by one, till you hit the one you search for. This is very disk intensive and slow. Sometimes the function does not exist at all. I read somewhere a procedure to find the affected file on some partition types. It must be linked somewere at the smartmontools web page, if I recall correctly. So it is easier to try to backup the partition, file by file. If one contains a badblock, you will get an error, maybe a crash of the tool. If no error, then overwrite the entire partition with zeroes, format and restore. > At that point, you'd just have to read the file to=20 > clear the error, no? Then make your backups and all is right with the = > world. No, a read does not clear the error. A write with failure triggers the relocation, automatically by the hard disk. The operating system may know nothing except the delay. > In my case, I think the disk got bashed when running so it trashed some= =20 > part of the disk, but its otherwise fine, cuz it's been 77 pending=20 > sectors for literally years otherwise of course I'd just replace the th= ing. Run badblocks (read mode) on the entire disk. --=20 Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar) --CVWqkwUUCGXx3FtmwwiBfH3ODsERu99ql-- --ajirp3x7mcOAcLdFXUpwC78OqT5VumewF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAliBDrEACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UevQCgk99OvcJdUS3oKbyRUezl64vz Af0An2GMTJIRwMV8A6M0Z+sRgRp/FI8k =Ly0I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ajirp3x7mcOAcLdFXUpwC78OqT5VumewF-- --===============0891810546121887427== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot --===============0891810546121887427== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Smartmontools-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support --===============0891810546121887427==--