Re: Channels getting deleted on new scan
"Timothy D. Lenz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.vdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It turns out that both stations are owned by the same company. I have sent KGUN9 a second email about the conflict and reported it to the FCC as interference because they interfering with each other. Looking at this site: https://www.linuxtv.org/vdrwiki/index.php/Syntax_of_channels.conf I found this near the end: "RID Radio ID. Typical 0. Can be used to differentiate between channels having the same SID, NID and TID." For some reason or another, I had to set all ATSC RID's to 0 for everything to work. I changed them to the entries in my conf but it doesn't seem to be working. Channels are not being deleted, but something is still wrong. Might be a problem with vdr admin. I had to add entries for a sat broadcast which (is scrambed) as 90 or 91 would not show. letting it set for a bit, looks like now I am seeing 581 guide data for 91. :( On 3/10/2018 1:30 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 10.03.2018 01:21, Torgeir Veimo wrote: >> Isn't there a plugin that can change such data before it gets processed? > > The problem is that these are *duplicate* channels - they can't be in the > channel list to begin with. They need to have different Transport Stream > Ids. > And as wen can see from Timothy's old channel list, they used to have > these. > So somebody just screwed up! > > Klaus > >> On 10 March 2018 at 08:47, Timothy D. Lenz <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Welllll, it gets better. Tonight I see VDR is grabbing guide data >> for 9x and using it for 58.x. So 58.x data is now being lost. grrrr >> >> >> On 3/9/2018 2:29 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> >> On 08.03.2018 22:38, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> >> On 08.03.2018 22:13, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: >> >> I was hoping it was something simple I could fix in >> the conf. I haven't worked on it or in linux in a long time and don't >> have the free time to figure it all out again. I'll have to look at >> this some other time. I am in the U.S. and these are ATA channels. >> They each have their own >> freq. and my guess is that they can use what ever >> numbers they want since they are on there own freq which they bought. >> >> >> Well, it's funny though that they use exactly the same IDs >> ;-). >> >> Sure they can do whatever they want, but there are a few >> basic rules that >> should be followed in order to guarantee a reasonable >> coexistance. One of >> them is that channels that are broadcast in the same area >> (like from the >> same terrestrial transmitter, on the same cable or the >> same satellite) >> should use unique IDs, even if they are on different >> transponders. One >> of these IDs is the "transport stream id", which in your >> case is 207 for >> both channels. This should be different. >> >> >> For testing I added your new channel list to my channels.conf. >> Here's what my VDR reported upon startup: >> >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] loading ../cfg/channels.conf >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> KWBA-HD,KWBA-HD:653028615:M10:A:0:49=2:0;52=eng@106,53=esl@106:0:0:3:0:207:0 >> >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> LATV,LATV:653028615:M10:A:0:65=2:0;68=eng@106:0:0:4:0:207:0 >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> ThisTV,ThisTV:653028615:M10:A:0:81=2:0;84=eng@106:0:0:5:0:207:0 >> >> With your old list I get no such log entries. So I guess >> somebody messed up >> with the TIDs, and the problem should be fixed there. >> >> Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list [email protected] https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr