Re: Usage of network file systems with vserver
Andrew Ruthven <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:43:47 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.vserver |
|---|---|
| Organization | Catalyst IT Limited |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 10:13 +0100, Oliver Welter wrote: > As my budget does not cover an invest in a "real" SAN/FibreChannel > backend, I am looking for practical experience with things like > GlusterFS, Ceph or other solutions based on decent "standard > servers". > Are those systems cooperating with the vserver approach and are > there > any things to take special care of? For a relatively low cost solution, we've been using Ceph as the block storage layer for the Catalyst Cloud quite happily for a few years now. Admittedly, the Catalyst Cloud isn't vserver based, but I see no reason why you couldn't use Ceph with vservers. A few good things about Ceph is it's easy to increase the number of IOPS by horizontally scaling it with more hard drives and/or servers. You can also significantly boost performance by putting the Ceph journals on SSDs or NVMe drives. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand Data Centre Manager MIITP At work: [email protected] At home: [email protected] Card : http://qr.catalyst.net.nz/907675e1 Cloud : NZs only real cloud - https://catalyst.net.nz/cloud GPG fpr: C603 FC4E 600F 1CEC D1C8 D97C 4B53 D931 E4D3 E863 LCA2018: Just a little bit of history repeating - http://linux.conf.au