Re: hashify
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:14:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.vserver |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:03:30PM -0600, Sandino Araico Sánchez wrote: > On 18/03/18 10:10, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote: >> If nothing is there in the code today to handle such issues, >> what is the right way to deal with it: >> 1) Don't care, as any problems arising from any possibly >> broken in-vm hardlinks are so rare that side-effects of it >> "never" happens? >> 2) Patch the vhashify code so that files that are already >> hardlinks inside a vm will not be hashified? (As suggested >> above) I think that is already done to some degree ... (Daniel for sure has all the details :) >> 3) Patch the CoW code so that it handles files that was >> originally hardlinked in the vm to be restored as hardlinked >> also when CoW does its work? > Patch de CoW code so that it breaks the hard link only when > the hard-linked other file is outside the VM. Good luck with finding the 'other' file(s) ... > Hard links inside the VM should be preserved as such. Best, Herbert >> 4) Don't use hashify? >> What do you suggest? Anyone with any experiences to share? >> BR, Tor Rune Skoglund, [email protected] > -- > Sandino Araico Sánchez > http://sandino.net