Re: funding the 5.10 vserver goal

Hi

On 06/07/2021 17:21, Ghislain Adnet wrote:
>   As per the thread talking about the future patch of vserver. On my
> side 5.10 is the longterm so i guess that everyone would like to go for
> the more recent LTS but 5.11 is the one i would like to have (mainly for
> btrfs performance).

One more question to Herbert, would that effort guarantee a VS patch
that would be maintained/updated as long as the 5.10/5.11 kernel?
If so, I would be OK to contribute a bit more than my original idea.

Cheers
-- 
Romain