Re: [WBEL-devel] Re: openssl security update needed

On Monday 22 March 2004 04:49 pm, John Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > confusing, but it works, and the performance benefits of '-march=i686
> > -mcpu=i686' are miniscule for OpenSSL.

> Actually openssl is one of the few packages where it makes a major
> difference, which is why both WBEL and RHEL include both an i386 and a
> i686 package.

I stand corrected in the OpenSSL case.
-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu