Re: [WBEL-devel] Testers needed

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Greg Hosler wrote:

> Did the openoffice.org rpm *really* upgrade ?

Oh crud.  I know I didn't notice the name change.  The change extends down
to the rpm package name inside the .spec, probably a trademark issue since
OO.o insists that the program must NEVER be referred to as simply
OpenOffice but that the .org be included.  Would be funny if RedHat got a
C&D letter.

Don't know how this one can be worked around, manual intervention is just 
going to be required.  Better post something on the webpage and in the 
errata notice when I send that out in a bit.

-- 
John M.      http://www.beau.org/~jmorris        This post is 100% M$ Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r