Re: [WBEL-users] Odd window drag behaviour
Andy <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:36:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user,gmane.linux.whitebox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree that keeping 100% compatible with RHEL is very important. But why not take it one step further? If people are maitaining their own "upgraded" versions of packages why not create a repository where they can upload their rpms for other people to use? I think it very would be useful to have Apt, Subversion just to name few in WBEL. Of course, all this in a clearly marked repository and disabled by default. I mean, that's what the "extras" folder is for on the mirrors right :-) Andy Alex Tkachenko wrote: >On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 17:51, John Morris wrote: > > >>On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Alex Tkachenko wrote: >> >> >> >>>It has a patch for RHEL version of metacity package - I have it >>>locally applied until it gets its way into the official update. >>> >>> >>Ok, this one bugs me enough I'm wondering if it justifies pushing up a >>patched version of metacity instead of waiting for RedHat to get around to >>it in U3. I know I'll be adding this patch to my own copies, but should >>it go into the mainline? It would mark a departure from tracking RH >>exactly and that worries me. >> >> >This is not the only problem with RHEL packages; I bet everybody comes >up with some sort of local repository sooner or later, but this is >exactly what it is: a local repository. The original goal is to keep the >main distribution (whitebox, centos, tao, etc) as close to the original >rhel, as possible, to make use of automatically distributed binary >updates and third-party software. Believe me, once you start fixing >packages yourself, you won't stop, and a year later you may find >yourself maintaining your own distro. The original compatibility, so >valuable because of the above reasons will be lost somewhere down the >road. > >So my advice - keep all the fixed packages clearly separated, and be >ready to restore the original set should you need it (especially true in >corporate environment). If you really need something more decent - go >for Fedora. > >Have a nice day, >Alex > >_______________________________________________ >Whitebox-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users > > > > >