[WBEL-devel] Centos and whitebox (etc)
Jon Peatfield <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:26:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Possibly I shouldn't ask this so obviously to both sets of devolopers but I'm curious to know if Centos and whitebox each have any major differences from each other. Both claim to be built from the RHEL srpms (with modifications to remove the trademark'd stuff etc). I discovered whitebox first simply because it was mentioned on another mailing list, but from first glance both appear to be attempting to fill the same niche (and both seem to be doing it pretty well). Clearly each distro will need slightly different tweaks (at least the strings might want to be different), and each will still want to build/sign their own RPMs -- unless they can merge their efforts of course. The same probably applies to the Fermi Scientific Linux etc too (though that isn't *just* a RHEL rebuild since they include a bunch of extra packages that they wrote/packaged up themselves). I've looked at the rhel-rebuilding mailing list (before someone points me there). Looking at the available trees it seems that centos has _slightly_ more recent updates (or maybe the wbel mirror I was looking at is a bit more out-of-date). Of course neither has included the "RHEL 3 update 3" stuff (but then I probably wouldn't expect that yet). -- Jon