[WBEL-devel] Re: RH AS 4 -- if you want RHEL 4 Beta, grab it (and don't wait for WBEL 4 Beta)
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:49:57 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: "William Hooper" <[email protected]> > The RHEL 4 Beta is freely downloadable. Why would you want to install > Fedora Core instead of the Beta if you wanted to look at the Beta? Okay then, let's apply that to the original question again then ... Why would you want to wait on WBEL 4 Beta instead of just installing RHEL 4 Beta now if it is freely downloadable? I could only assume because of some distribution, trademark or updating issue? If so, in the absence of WBEL 4 Beta, you could install FC3. If not, then just install RHEL 4 Beta since it is indeed freely downloadble. Both FC and WBEL solve the issues of distribution, trademark and updates. If the WBEL version is not available, and RHEL isn't an option to you for various reasons, then consider the equivalent FC revision. -- Bryan J. Smith [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal Cost of Ownership (SCO) for Windows being less than Linux Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) assumes experts for the former, costly retraining for the latter, omitted "software assurance" costs in compatible desktop OS/apps for the former, no free/legacy reuse for latter, and no basic security, patch or downtime comparison at all.