[WBEL-devel] Wrong release number for fixed 'at' package
Milan Kerslager <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I just found at-3.1.8-47 on the master site.
Please, never bump up version (or release) when Red Hat did not made it
itself. Use instead something like:
at-3.1.8-46_WB3
at-3.1.8-46_WB3.1
at-3.1.8-46_WB3.2
...
at-3.1.8-46_WB3.128
What we will do when RH will make errata for at package with different
fix? Bumping release number could completly break connection to RHEL.
This is unneded and IMHO simply wrong turn.
X.Y.Z-A.B_WBsomething conform to Waren's proposal for naming packages in
Fedora project too, see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-November/msg00327.html
--
Milan Kerslager
E-mail: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.pslib.cz/~kerslage/