RE: [WBEL-devel] Choosing a RHEL rebuild project
Jamey Fletcher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Hedemark, Magnus wrote: > Orlando Rubino Gala [mailto:[email protected]] said: > > CenTOS is a toy. WhiteBoxLinux is much more serious. > Sure, and Fidel Castro is a renowned humanitarian. And this belongs off in alt.flame WBEL, RBEL, and CenTOS (And Taos) are what they are. I personally am getting less and less enchanted with the direction RedHat is taking on their distribution - I had Enlightenment running on RH9 with minor hair-pulling, but what worked for it is refusing to work under WBEL. I *REALLY* hate Nautilus, and how you have an extremely limited list of views under it... However, on the up side, I'm having a lot of good results with apt-get and the FreshRPMS.net stuff for RH9 on WhiteBox. So, we'll see what shakes out - *PERSONALLY*, what *I* want, is for RH to get its head out of its ass, and take back the segment of the market WBEL is aiming for. Oh, and a new hard drive for my laptop, something a bit bigger than 10Gig, so I can try out a couple of different distros, find something a bit more to my tastes... Maybe Mandrake or if someone is doing a pre-compiled Gentoo. -- Jamey ----<--<@ [email protected]