[WBEL-users] Re: Mirror sites, rsync and version 4.0
Jerry Amundson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat April 15 2006 15:31, Alon wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > Thanks for the reply (for the second time). > > Yes,. that is the same question I had last time and your response is > the same. I've been having problems rsyncing manually > (probably missing a path of somesort) andn therefore I was asking > about it again. Please reply to the list, not to posters directly. It's the "whitebox-users" list, not "jerry's-whitebox-support". ;-) > I've been working with only version 3.0 and it has been great. > > I've not used the version 4.0 until now, but it appears that the > update process for version 3.0, with rsync or without it, is getting > slower each time. "with rsync or without it"? With rsync means you point your yum repo to your local update server. It being "slower" is then only relevent to you. > I understand that in your opinion, the version 4.0 is considered > stable and is widely supported. > I only use it for webhosting, not even using a GUI in anyway,. so > this should be fine.. right? Yep. > I'm just worried of changes which are of dramatic nature (such as > this). Don't be. It's not surgery - nobody's going to die, even worst case scenario... :-) > The rsync option you suggested, can it be applied to the version 4.0? Yes. > I am doing HTTP installations, so what should my exclude file > contain? You had SRPMS, but don't I need that for a initial install? YMMV. Correct, you don't need SRPMS. jerry