[WBEL-users] Re: Mirror sites, rsync and version 4.0

Jerry Amundson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.whitebox.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat April 15 2006 15:31, Alon wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thanks for the reply (for the second time).
>
> Yes,. that is the same question I had last time and your response is
> the same. I've been having problems rsyncing manually
> (probably missing a path of somesort) andn therefore I was asking
> about it again.

Please reply to the list, not to posters directly. It's the 
"whitebox-users" list, not "jerry's-whitebox-support". ;-)

> I've been working with only version 3.0 and it has been great.
>
> I've not used the version 4.0 until now, but it appears that the
> update process for version 3.0, with rsync or without it, is getting
> slower each time.

"with rsync or without it"? With rsync means you point your yum repo to 
your local update server. It being "slower" is then only relevent to 
you.

> I understand that in your opinion, the version 4.0 is considered
> stable and is widely supported.
> I only use it for webhosting, not even using a GUI in anyway,. so
> this should be fine.. right?

Yep.

> I'm just worried of changes which are of dramatic nature (such as
> this).

Don't be. It's not surgery - nobody's going to die, even worst case 
scenario... :-)

> The rsync option you suggested, can it be applied to the version 4.0?

Yes.

> I am doing HTTP installations, so what should my exclude file
> contain? You had SRPMS, but don't I need that for a initial install?

YMMV. Correct, you don't need SRPMS.

jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.