Re: [WBEL-users] Screwed by a CentOS4 install test
John Morris <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Beauregard Parish Library |
| Message-ID | <1145398307.4114.4.camel@mjolnir> |
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 14:36, John Morris wrote: > In the end you might be chasing the wrong culprit. There were > persistent reports that test releases of FC5 was borking older ext3 > filesystems, even ones not explicitly being requested to be mounted, by > flipping on new filesystem features that are not backwards compatible. > > Have been meaning to try a controlled experiment to find out if it a) it > is true and b) if it persisted into the final FC5 release. Replying to myself... found time to run a controlled experiment. FC5 is safe, it won't harm a WBEL3/RHEL3 install even if you have FC5 mount it while running anaconda. So that rules that out. -- John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$Free! Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r