Re: [WBEL-users] 64-bit lib adventure
John Morris <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Beauregard Parish Library |
| Message-ID | <1149030246.5711.15.camel@mjolnir> |
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:30, Jerry Amundson wrote: > Short question : Why are i368 rpm's on the x86_64 iso's? So i386 apps can run. For example OO.o is still 32 bit. Also, you can't even build an x86_64 package without a couple of 32bit packages installed and there are even a few needed just to install, as you discovered with your attempt to build a xen image. Debian's x86_64 port was done as a pure port, having no 32bit dependencies and is thus simpler and a more clean install. The price is that it IS a port, and you have to jump through chroot hoops to get i[36]86 apps to install and run. I think RH took the harder path with their bi-arch approach but since we are going to be dealing with 32bit apps for years to come it is also the better solution. -- John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$Free! Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r