Re: [WBEL-users] Upgrading to 2.6.9-42.0.3
"Fernando ApesteguĂa" <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:14:21 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/15/06, Vic <[email protected]> wrote: > > One follow-up quesiton: > > > > When I did the rpmbuild -ba .... it generated all of these packages: > > kernel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-largesmp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm > > > > I'm just interested in the first one. It's possible to generate only > > this one to save some time? > > Yes. > > Have a look at the .spec file - it has the lines : > > %define buildup 1 > %define buildsmp 1 > %define buildsource 0 > %define buildhugemem 1 > %define buildlargesmp 1 > > Change the "1"S to "0"s if you don't want to build that version. Hey man, once again (and I've done this a lot of times :) ) thank you very much. Just another question: If I link the BUIL/kernel-xxx/linux-2.6.9-xxx to /usr/src/linux, programs that expect to have the kernel sources in /usr/src/linux right? However, some programs (like the ATI drivers) return a "not version.h file found" Do you know something about this? Thanks > > HTH > > Vic. > > > _______________________________________________ > Whitebox-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users >