Re: [WBEL-users] Upgrade Path
Scott Silva <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:36:27 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kyle spake the following on 11/28/2006 12:52 PM: > Hi Folks, > > I am in a situation where I need to upgrade a live and hot WBEL 3.0 box > to a 2.6.9 kernel. And I have to do it over ssh. I can't get into the > box itself, so if anything happens to go wrong with a kernel compile, > I'm pretty much screwed. > > Yum doesn't appear to have anything available in a 2.6 kernel. What > would be your suggestions please? > > Do I attempt a 2.6 kernel compile, or do I just have the data centre > upgrade it to WBEL 4.0 or even CentOS 4.x. Is there even a simple > upgrade path for RHEL based distros in the same way there is for MS OS's? You will have to compile a kernel yourself, but with all the other things you will have to change with a 2.6 kernel, you would be better off with an upgrade to 4.0. If your data center can do it, great, but if not, and you have access to another host that you can store a copy of a distro on, you can upgrade over vnc. Here is a link to do just that from CentOS 3 to CentOS 4... http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2005/06/15/upgrading_to_centos4_over_a_remote_vnc_c You might want to consider CentOS over Whitebox as Whitebox seems to be getting a bit stagnant. Updates have been slow, and I haven't heard anything from John on the list for a while. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!