Re: [WBEL-users] Fast system clock
Johnny Hughes <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:49:20 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 13:10 +0000, Francies Moore wrote: > > > > Is the CentOS install running the same kernel version as the Whitebox install > > was running? > > > > > Hi Scott > > It was running the latest 2.6.9.42 kernel from CentOS but I have > reverted it to the original WBEL kernel 2.6.9(whatever - sorry the box > isn't here) and the time then stayed nearer to being correct, although > it was slowly gaining when I left it last night. > > Incidentally Knoppix 3.8.1 was unusable on this box as it was "too fast" > - each keypress caused immediate repeating and so even the shell could > not be used (kernel 2.6.11). > > Looks like I have a box which don't like kernel 2.6... Maybe I should > try WBEL3 or CentOS 3 on it next week (or FC1) - it would be nice to be > able to deploy this system usefully. > > (I will post my Up2date errors later so as not to confuse the issue!) > > Thanks > > Francies clock=pit or clock=pmtmr or clock=tsc on the kernel line might help (tsc is the default) http://kb.vmware.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/329/1420_f.SAL_Public.html (that link is for vmware, but it is applicable to normal machines too) also check for updated bios from the motherboard manufacturer. _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list [email protected] http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF4GyQTKkMgmrBY7MRAptkAJ4lmHJHPcc7q5lp/1kf+D96sWdOTwCgqUJ0 tDSluT6B4gwXuOrC5l5jjeA= =xHTm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----