Re: [WBEL-users] new DST on WBL 3.0...
"Mike B." <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:44:23 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 3/11/2007 06:41 PM, Jeff Lasman wrote: >On Sunday 11 March 2007 01:40 pm, Mike B. wrote: > > > Any idea why Linux doesn't use a symlink for /etc/localtime? That > > would have let me skip the cp step and just build stuff in > > /usr/share/zoneinfo and be done with it. > >Would "simply because it doesn't" answer your question? Pretty much. If unix wasn't already using a symlink it would answer it completely, but with a fairly well-known example of a better way to do it, it makes me wonder why the Linux developers didn't do it the same way. They are smart folks, so I figured maybe there was a good reason, but there doesn't have to be. ;-) > We've done it >on our test boxes and as soon as I have time to check them Monday... if >they worked, we'll install links on other servers as well. Thanks for the info! -- Mike B. -- My computer beats me at chess. But it's no match for me at kickboxing.