[WBEL-users] I was subscribed to this list and cannot unsubscribe

Sorry for the post.  I was added back into this mailing list
just recently probably due to a rebuild of the mailing list
server/database or something.

I am unable to unsubscribe from this list.

Can the administrator please remove me from the list permanently!

Thanks,

Ed


-----Original Message-----
From:	[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]
Sent:	Thu 3/22/2007 1:01 PM
To:	[email protected]
Cc:	
Subject:	Whitebox-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 9

Send Whitebox-users mailing list submissions to
	[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	[email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
	[email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Whitebox-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Dale)
   2. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Scott Silva)
   3. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Dale)
   4. RE: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Purcocks, Graham)
   5. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Vic)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:03:34 -0500
From: Dale <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?

Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update 
my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could 
find on the list, but that still doesn't work.

Dale wrote:
> Hi all, have a WB3.x server that has very little use and I missed the 
> appropriate posts for what I need to change and what to change it to 
> in order for yum to download appropriate updates (including hopefully 
> the appropriate updates for the new US time zones).
>
> Thanks in advance for the info.
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:41:20 -0700
From: Scott Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:
> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?
> 
> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update
> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could
> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.
> 
This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!
There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but haven't
seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to Centos
or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was said on
the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet". I find
the latter hard to believe.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:47:18 -0500
From: Dale <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Scott,

Scott Silva wrote:
> Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:
>   
>> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?
>>
>> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update
>> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could
>> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.
>>     
> This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!
> There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but haven't
> seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to Centos
> or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was said on
> the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet". I find
> the latter hard to believe.
>
>   
I hadn't been having much of any problems on this one remaining WB 3.x 
machine, the others have been migrated to CentOS, just need to get this 
one updated as it won't be migrated to CentOS for a few months.

Dale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20070321/e56f371e/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:55:14 -0400
From: "Purcocks, Graham" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?
To: "Scott Silva" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
	<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I use //ftp.esat.net/mirrors/whiteboxlinux.org/3.0

But I've found the games rpm header is corrupt which stops a lot of the
checking. SO I haven't installed the last update.

Is anyone else using this mirror and seeing the same problem? If we had
another official mirror I'd pull from them. Maybe I'll try direct from
Beau. Mirrors, do seem to be an issue.

Graham 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
Sent: 21 March 2007 23:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?

Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:
> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?
> 
> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to
update
> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I
could
> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.
> 
This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!
There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but
haven't
seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to
Centos
or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was
said on
the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet".
I find
the latter hard to believe.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users




------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:46:01 -0000 (GMT)
From: "Vic" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

> There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but
> haven't seen anything else about it.

I'm not sure it's relevant any more - I've just had a whole bunch of
updates from the pre-existing servers. Looks like JM's back on the case.
Welcome back, mate!

Vic.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users


End of Whitebox-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 9
*********************************************

_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users