Re: [WBEL-users] Upgrading from Whitebox to RHEL
"Mike B." <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:37:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 4/26/2007 01:09 PM, Scott Silva wrote: >wasting your money. They will probably recommend a clean install and careful >data restore. This raises a different question...one that may be obvious to long-time unix/linux folks, but not to us relatively new ones: What is the best way to deal with upgrades and re-installations of linux? That is, how do you preserve all the configuration changes, startup customizations, user accounts, cron scripts, DNS zone files, and other system management "stuff" that accumulates on a system over time when you re-install the OS or upgrade or switch to a different distribution? Manually re-customizing and repeating all the setup work may be possible, but it's not an attractive option at all. When you upgrade within a distro this is usually not an issue...files don't get deleted, upgrade scripts usually rename them if they get replaced with upgraded ones so you can merge in whatever is still relevant, and user directories aren't touched, etc.. When you do a clean install, this isn't the case. Getting listings of files changed since you installed before you shut down the old system might be one way to catch what you need to save, but it will also catch a lot of stuff you may not care about (old logs, backup copies of edited files, programs that are going to be replaced anyway, programs you don't want anymore, etc.) and weeding it isn't much more attractive than repeating all the work. If you were really organized, you'd maintain a copy of all updated critical files in some directory that isn't part of the "system"...like the sysadmin's home directory tree, or a directory off of /home or something, and always change there then copy into /etc, /var or wherever the files need to live, but all it would take is a small lapse of attention and you'd be missing something potentially important. If you had such a thing, you could pretty easily copy again after making sure the file contents were still relevant. How do the experienced folks deal with this problem? -- Mike B. -- I have not seen as far as others because giants were standing on my shoulders.