Re: [WBEL-users] Show of hands for WBEL5?
"Alon" <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:06:59 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.whitebox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C670D11204E54071A65DDF9731FC6FC3@alonquadxp> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0414944403== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B0_01C8EEA2.C254A920" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02B0_01C8EEA2.C254A920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I still have two WBEL boxes version 3 and version 4. I'm still using them. I don't think I'll use WBEL5, but I'm still keeping my options open :). -Alon. =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Vic=20 To: [email protected]=20 Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:21 PM Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] Show of hands for WBEL5? > Does anyone still actually use WBEL? Yes. Almost all my Linux customers use WBEL. And I expect it to stay that = way. > Judging by the less than one message > a month I would say the userbase defected to CentOS and WBEL efforts = would > be better spent contributing there if there is need. My efforts are not going to CentOS. Vic. _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list [email protected] http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users ------=_NextPart_000_02B0_01C8EEA2.C254A920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16674" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I still have two WBEL boxes version 3 and = version=20 4.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I'm still using them.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I don't think I'll use WBEL5, but I'm still keeping = my options=20 open :).</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>-Alon.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A [email protected] = href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">Vic</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = [email protected]=20 href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 25, 2008 = 9:21 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [WBEL-users] Show = of hands=20 for WBEL5?</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>> Does anyone still actually use=20 WBEL?<BR><BR>Yes.<BR><BR>Almost all my Linux customers use WBEL. And I = expect=20 it to stay that way.<BR><BR>> Judging by the less than one = message<BR>>=20 a month I would say the userbase defected to CentOS and WBEL efforts=20 would<BR>> be better spent contributing there if there is = need.<BR><BR>My=20 efforts are not going to=20 = CentOS.<BR><BR>Vic.<BR><BR>______________________________________________= _<BR>Whitebox-users=20 mailing list<BR><A=20 = href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A><BR><A= =20 = href=3D"http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/= mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_02B0_01C8EEA2.C254A920-- --===============0414944403== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list [email protected] http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users --===============0414944403==--