Re: [ANNOUNCE] WOLK v1.0 for Kernel v2.6.3
Marc-Christian Petersen <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:17:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.wolk.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Working Overloaded Linux Kernel |
| Message-ID | <200402271636.04297@WOLK> |
On Friday 27 February 2004 13:20, ian sison (mailing list) wrote: Hi Ian, > Maybe it's time we talk about kernel 2.6.x then. Question, is it really > ready for production? I mean, coming from us here who have run WOLK in > production, is there really a compelling reason now to consider moving to > 2.6, or 2.6-WOLK? Well, personally I wont' move any of our production machines or customer machines to 2.6 yet. It's still beta though it's "official stable" ;). Personally I had a "small" ext3 corruption bug some days ago after I did: echo 64 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages (so bleh, I can't use Oracle. WTF :() It gave me an oops, then almost no process worked anymore, calling new processes hung immediately, init 6 the same, so I did sysrq-b (like I always do when I reboot and never had a problem with 2.2 or 2.4: Even 2.2 ext3 0.07 alpha code does no harm to my FS :P ... but after the reboot, my /lib and /usr/lib were almost completely fucked up. I had to reinstall tons of libraries (ELF header was fucked up). Well, but after that, 2.6 is up and running on one of my machines (desktop) w/o any problemas "yet" - We'll see. Hint: boot with "elevator=cfq" for desktop :) Also some other users on #kernelnewbies and such channels on IRC use 2.6 for a long time w/o any problems. > It would be nice if those who have tried 2.6 can give their observations > on how 2.6.x runs in comparison to 2.4-WOLK. Well, for my experience, 2.6-WOLK runs smoother as 2.4-WOLK, but that's generally a 2.6 "feature" and afaik only interesting for desktop usage. I really miss grsecurity for 2.6. If Brad (grsec man) won't come up with a 2.6 version soon I start looking at 2.4 current grsec code and try to port it, at least some of the important features. Last but not bleh, if you have a big iron machine (say, 32 cpu's, 256gb ram, tons of $fucking_fast_whatever_SCSI_or_so) you'd like to choose 2.6-WOLK and no 2.4-WOLK ;) ciao, Marc ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel