Re: [ANNOUNCE] WOLK v1.0 for Kernel v2.6.3

Marc-Christian Petersen <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:17:18 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.wolk.devel
Organization Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
Message-ID <200402271636.04297@WOLK>
On Friday 27 February 2004 13:20, ian sison (mailing list) wrote:

Hi Ian,

> Maybe it's time we talk about kernel 2.6.x then.  Question, is it really
> ready for production?  I mean, coming from us here who have run WOLK in
> production, is there really a compelling reason now to consider moving to
> 2.6, or 2.6-WOLK?

Well, personally I wont' move any of our production machines or customer
machines to 2.6 yet. It's still beta though it's "official stable" ;).

Personally I had a "small" ext3 corruption bug some days ago after I did:

echo 64 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

(so bleh, I can't use Oracle. WTF :()

It gave me an oops, then almost no process worked anymore, calling new
processes hung immediately, init 6 the same, so I did sysrq-b (like I always
do when I reboot and never had a problem with 2.2 or 2.4: Even 2.2 ext3 0.07
alpha code does no harm to my FS :P ... but after the reboot, my /lib
and /usr/lib were almost completely fucked up. I had to reinstall tons of
libraries (ELF header was fucked up). Well, but after that, 2.6 is up and
running on one of my machines (desktop) w/o any problemas "yet" - We'll see.
Hint: boot with "elevator=cfq" for desktop :)

Also some other users on #kernelnewbies and such channels on IRC use 2.6 for a
long time w/o any problems.

> It would be nice if those who have tried 2.6 can give their observations
> on how 2.6.x runs in comparison to 2.4-WOLK.

Well, for my experience, 2.6-WOLK runs smoother as 2.4-WOLK, but that's
generally a 2.6 "feature" and afaik only interesting for desktop usage.

I really miss grsecurity for 2.6. If Brad (grsec man) won't come up with a
 2.6 version soon I start looking at 2.4 current grsec code and try to port
 it, at least some of the important features.

Last but not bleh, if you have a big iron machine (say, 32 cpu's, 256gb ram,
tons of $fucking_fast_whatever_SCSI_or_so) you'd like to choose 2.6-WOLK and
no 2.4-WOLK ;)

ciao, Marc


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel