Re: n th's try to ask for help / non-X86 arch

On Monday 08 March 2004 15:36, Kerin Millar wrote:

Hi Kerin,

> To be fair, Marc has his own subdirectory at kernel.org now and, as of the
> 2.6 branch, he is maintaining each individual patch under the broken-out/
> sub-directory, so it's quite easy to see how the patchset is composed. It
> would be nice to see this for the 2.4 branch also, even if Marc has not
> enough resources to continue any real development on it. Apart from
> anything, it's fascinating from even an educational perspective.

:-) Thanks.


> Granted, things could be more organised - but that comes back to the point
> that Marc needs extra developers in order for this to be the case.
> Developers who are capable of maintaining their remit (whatever that might
> be) and who can consistently apply themselves. Even the website could be
> better, the sources of the patches could be nicely documented ... lots of
> things.

full ack. The website WOLK has is, to be honest: completely CRAP! Maybe things 
will me alot more easier if there is a real decent web page.


> I don't think Marc is trying to make anything hard, but he is clearly
exact. Why should I do that :)


> limited in terms of time and resources. I suspect he would be open to
> constructive suggestions as to how the situation could be improved
> (notwithstanding the need for more developers) ... wouldn't you Marc?

I am open for everything. Let's discuss suggestions.

ciao, Marc



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel