Re: WOLK5 for 2.4.26?

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:52:17AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:

Hi,

> ok, to make it short: I'm disposed to cook up a new WOLK for 2.4.26 or 2.4.27
> when the following conditions are met:

Sounds good.

> 2. When I have to merge XYZ, I need some people who are doing it within a few
>    days. NOT just saying doing so, instead do it for real, within <= 3 days
>    max.

I experience the occasional pang of guilt. :) Alas, I still can't promise
anything about reaction times. Trustees for 2.6.5 has been on my todo list
for what seems like ages, but I can't seem to get around to it these days.
In fact, I'm even considering moving away from trustees altogether to get
rid of the code maintenance burden. (Just blogging, I know nobody cares,
which is alright.)

> Basically I want to do the following stuff in/out:
> 
> 1. NO rmap, therefore fixing the mainline VM which is b0rked.

Wow. That's a very good start.

> 3. grsecurity2
> 4. uml-skas3

This will be tricky to have at the same time. But you know that.

> 6. LVM2/EVMS/DM brand new code

I'd only go for LVM2 if the mirror target can also be added, otherwise
pvmove will cease to work.

> Ok, so what do you think?

I think you won't find the help you need. :( But I hope I'm wrong.

Andrew

-- 
          Andrew Korn (Korn Andras) <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu>
                 <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/>	QOTD:
           Hardware: The part you kick. Software: this you corrupt!


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel