Re: 2.4-WOLK v4.15s

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:

> On Wednesday 05 May 2004 18:20, KORN Andras wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > Would be nice to have, yes, if it's not too much trouble... (I understand
> > > it substantially reduces the memory usage of UML.)
> > Uh, just got to thinking - I hope you're not doing this only because I
> > requested it? I don't think I'll ever use 2.4.x UML host kernels at all.
>
> hmm, I did it because you asked some time ago :/ .. Anyway, maybe other people
> like it/use it.
>
> I'd like to know why you don't use 2.4.x UML host kernels at all? Is it bad?
> Dunno, I never used UML at all until today.
>

Actually the only thing stopping me from not playing around with UML is
because it wasn't part of WOLK up until now...





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel