Re: 2.4-WOLK v4.15s

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 06:51:03PM +0200, KORN Andras wrote:

Hi,

> > > > Would be nice to have, yes, if it's not too much trouble... (I understand
> > > > it substantially reduces the memory usage of UML.)
> > > Uh, just got to thinking - I hope you're not doing this only because I
> > > requested it? I don't think I'll ever use 2.4.x UML host kernels at all.
> > 
> > hmm, I did it because you asked some time ago :/ .. Anyway, maybe other people 
> > like it/use it.
> 
> Of that, I'm certain - I can post URLs to #UML, or maybe someone who is
> subscribed could post to their mailing list. I know other people had tried
> to use skas with grsec.

The #UML crowd was quite enthusiastic:

23:10 <Guy-> oh BTW, mcp merged host-skas with grsec and PaX in WOLK if anyone's interested
23:11 <jdike> Guy-: there have been a number of requests for skas + grsec
23:11 <Darkman> does it work? last grsec+skas patch i saw just segfaulted uml
23:11 <jdike> Guy-: don't know if they want all of WOLK, though
23:12 <sikkh> Guy-: cool
23:13 <sikkh> jdike: grsecurity is highly configurable as most WOLK addons
23:13 <Darkman> the traffic on #uml is higher these days imho ;)
23:14 <sikkh> :)
23:14 <sikkh> jdike: you can leave a lot of WOLK stuff out if you want, also they have good testing

Andrew

-- 
          Andrew Korn (Korn Andras) <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu>
                 <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/>	QOTD:
                Everything that is not mandatory is forbidden.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel