Re: kernel crash with simple C code

On Monday 14 June 2004 22:21, Christian Lyra wrote:

Hi Christian,

> 	Are you sure? I have no sunday messages, only saturday and today.
> anyway... I missed it...

yes, I am sure:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=4816005&forum_id=8245


> > Another thing why mainline kernels are bullshit concerning security. I am
> > curious if a 2.4.26 mainline + grsec 1.9.15 or 2.0 is still crashable. If
> > it is, aehm, I stop this sentence. You should know what I mean ;)
> 	ah yes... sometimes I think about using OpenBSD :-). About 2.4.26 + grsec
> 2.0...

and then? OpenBSD is shit also.


> http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html
> this guy said that yes... it is crashable! and no... I dont know what you
> mean :-)

I mean that Brad always brag that grsec is not vulnerable to any known exploit 
and even not vulnerable to any unknown exploit to the public and he always 
says that he knows alot of not-known-public exploits.

Now that's proven wrong :p

ciao, Marc


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wolk-devel