Re: [PATCH net] net/x25: Fix overflow when accumulating packets
Martin Schiller <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:36:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.x25,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | TDT AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-03-27 09:30, Martin Schiller wrote: > Add a check to ensure that `x25_sock.fraglen` does not overflow. > > The `fraglen` also needs to be resetted when purging `fragment_queue` > in > `x25_clear_queues()`. > > Reported-by: Yiming Qian <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <[email protected]> > --- > net/x25/x25_in.c | 6 ++++++ > net/x25/x25_subr.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/x25/x25_in.c b/net/x25/x25_in.c > index > b981a4828d08c2e6676749a06035910eab01e6cd..1603238d6fff73090ef10b5fd11387b3e7f017a2 > 100644 > --- a/net/x25/x25_in.c > +++ b/net/x25/x25_in.c > @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ static int x25_queue_rx_frame(struct sock *sk, > struct sk_buff *skb, int more) > struct sk_buff *skbo, *skbn = skb; > struct x25_sock *x25 = x25_sk(sk); > > + /* make sure we don't overflow */ > + if (x25->fraglen + skb->len > sizeof(x25->fraglen)) { Please ignore this patch. I'll send a V2 without that "sizeof()" nonsense in a moment. > + kfree_skb(skb); > + return 1; > + } > + > if (more) { > x25->fraglen += skb->len; > skb_queue_tail(&x25->fragment_queue, skb); > diff --git a/net/x25/x25_subr.c b/net/x25/x25_subr.c > index > 0285aaa1e93c17233748d38eef6d8b5c6059b67a..159708d9ad20cb2e6db24ead67daf1e9d6258f64 > 100644 > --- a/net/x25/x25_subr.c > +++ b/net/x25/x25_subr.c > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void x25_clear_queues(struct sock *sk) > skb_queue_purge(&x25->interrupt_in_queue); > skb_queue_purge(&x25->interrupt_out_queue); > skb_queue_purge(&x25->fragment_queue); > + x25->fraglen = 0; > } > > > > --- > base-commit: 4ae97cae07e15d41e5c0ebabba64c6eefdeb0bbe > change-id: 20260325-x25_fraglen-8fc240d1edd3 > > Best regards,