Re: xdg Digest, Vol 157, Issue 3

Daniel Stone <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel
Message-ID <CAPj87rOy2Z9wXALMNbe4nP+Ryw81oiF6wcyFMjhK6fmXjPuboA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alexandre,

On 11 April 2017 at 12:43, Alexandre Franke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Daniel Stone <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 11. Apr. 2017 um 13:26
>> Uhr:
>>> Constructive feedback on the specific form and wording of the CoC is
>>> more than welcome. What would be even better is if you're able to
>>> point to the experiences of other communities, the discussions they've
>>> had, and where they landed. The exact wording isn't irreversibly set
>>> in stone, and I'm sure we'll want to be tweaking it over time. What is
>>> set in stone is that we (the fd.o admins, who unanimously approved
>>> this change) are committed to this CoC, and will not be turning back
>>> from it.
>
> I encourage you to read https://grep.be/blog//en/retorts/Codes_of_Conduct/

I'm familiar with the Debian CoC, and the discussions around its
introduction. I hadn't read Wouter's specific blog; it's an
interesting point, but I'm not sure I agree. It's definitely something
to consider though, and I'd like to compare it to best practice
elsewhere. Thanks!

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.