Re: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR: When is a user logged out?

Thomas Kluyver <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel
Message-ID <1525962463.2166586.1367515768.7114D0BD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Thanks Lennart. Would it make sense for our application code to open a Pam session in this scenario so it counts as a login? Sorry if this is a silly question: I know ~nothing about how logins work.

Thomas

On Thu, May 10, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 10.05.18 09:38, Thomas Kluyver ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
> > The basedir spec says of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR:
> > 
> > > ...if the user fully logs out the directory MUST be removed.
> > 
> > What counts as logging out? For some application code, I assumed that if the application was running as user X, that meant user X was still logged in, and the application could rely on XDG_RUNTIME_DIR continuing to exist. However, some users have reported that if they run a process in nohup/screen and then disconnect, their XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is deleted because they have logged out. It looks like other people have had similar issues:
> > 
> > https://github.com/projectatomic/libpod/issues/659
> > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/386504/how-do-you-keep-systemd-user-services-alive-over-mosh
> > 
> > I tested this on a Debian system and I couldn't reproduce the problem: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR continued to exist when I disconnected and left a script running in nohup. But I don't know what to tell users who are experiencing this issue.
> > 
> > 1. When should the user count as logged out? Is my assumption that
> > the user is logged in while any process is running with their UID
> > reasonable? Can we clarify this in the spec?
> 
> I wrote the part of the spec initially, but I left this intentionally
> vague, to give impementors a bit of freedom to define their session
> lifetimes.
> 
> That said, on systemd systems the definition of "being logged in" is
> generally bound to "there's at least one PAM session around" for the
> user. And that is usually bound to "is there an utmp entry for the
> user"...
> 
> And by that definition just having a process with the user's UID
> around is *not* sufficient to keep the XDG_RUNTIME_DIR around.
> 
> Lennart
> 
> -- 
> Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.