Re: A spec to set default terminal applications?

Ian Huang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel
Message-ID <CA+-XgaHfU8AuGogHDmWLzo5Pj6k6FdLMmZStnAsb6iATfYDiDw@mail.gmail.com>
Vladimir Kudrya <[email protected]>

> Last year I proposed a mechanism for this purpose:
> https://github.com/Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec/
>

I like this proposal a lot, but it seems to me to be a little inconsistent
with the selection of other default handlers. Mostly just because it would
require a second desktop file for each application to put under the
xdg-terminals/ directory. Though I'm no X developer, I also can't think of
a cleaner way to do this, so I think it should be considered again.


Liam R E Quin <[email protected]>

> There's a MIME type for a shell script, which seems appropriate?
>

I also don't think using the existing shell script MIME
type makes sense . . . not all applications that run in terminals are shell
scripts, and it would seem to be more appropriate to reserve such a MIME
type to serve as only the shell-language equivalent type of, say, Python
scripts.

Ultimately, I think if the solution is to use a MIME type, I think it
should be a dummy one that assigns a terminal as its handler but does not
have actual files with the type. Such a decision would be to avoid the
terminal being the default handler for existing files, since really what we
want to do (as far as I understand) is to open .desktop files of type
text/plain and not shell scripts. Unless you want to make a new type
specifically for .desktop files that have Terminal=true selected. . . .

_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.