Re: Cleaning of $XDG_CACHE_HOME and $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails

Bastien Nocera <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:24 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:14 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Flatpak'ed applications also use a different cache directory, like:
> > $ export | grep CACHE
> > declare -x XDG_CACHE_HOME="/home/hadess/.var/app/<app-id>/cache"
> > 
> > I'd say that it might better left well alone, and have something
> > like
> > Baobab better signal what each directory is/which application it
> > belongs to, to clean it up.
> 
> This specification change would only affect the $XDG_CACHE_HOME as
> set
> at login time by pam_systemd (i.e. ~/.cache).
> 
> So in principle, Flatpak'ed applications are not affected at all.
> However, the logical extension of this proposal would be that
> appropriate configurations are shipped inside each Flatpak. Then we
> also have a cleanup mechanism there that does not depend on the
> application to be run regularly.
> 
> I had not thought about that yet. I could imagine Flatpak collecting
> the information and doing the simple re-write and dropping it into
> ~/.config/tmpfiles.d or $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/tmpfiles.d at login time.
> And
> Flatpak itself could again ship a default to clean .var/app/*/cache
> by 
> default.

In this case, an opt-in would be less surprising than an opt-out.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.