Re: Age Verification laws
Thayne McCombs <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 00:51:03 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.xdg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/3/26 9:17 AM, Lucas Holt wrote: > and clearly defined app store On 3/3/26 5:54 PM, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > Whether a package manager counts as an app store is debatable The definition in AB 1043 is: > “Covered application store” means a publicly available internet website, software application, online service, or platform that distributes and facilitates the download of applications from third-party developers to users of a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing that can access a covered application store or can download an application. I think it would be pretty difficult to argue a package manager doesn't meet that criteria. Your best hope is maybe claiming that packages in an official repository are "first party", since the distribution builds them. However, it would definitely apply to things like Flatpak, Snap, etc. not to mention any website where you can download linux binaries from. On 3/2/26 7:54PM, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > kids have birthdays. My 12 year old will soon change age group (depending on when the group starts, but 13 is a common start of a new group). That change doesn't necessarily have to be automatic. It could be the parent's responsibility to update the age category... if they so desire. In fact automatically updating the age category could leak information about the user. If you were in the under 13 age category yesterday, but in the 13-16 age category today, then an application can know when your birthday was.