Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:11:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.xdg.devel,gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 09 Mar 2026 19:39:52 -0600 "Jeremy Soller" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, >=20 > My name is Jeremy Soller, and I am Principal Engineer at System76. We > released a statement on Age Verification laws last Thursday that you > can read here: >=20 > https://blog.system76.com/post/system76-on-age-verification >=20 > Our Founder and CEO, Carl Richell, was able to get a meeting with > Senator Matt Ball today to discuss the Colorado version of the > California bill, SB26-051. His statements after the meeting are as > follows: >=20 > https://floss.social/@[email protected]/116201429734101067 Wow, this is great to see! Thank you (both you and Carl) for doing this, and for letting us know! -- Aaron > > Today, I met with Colorado Senator Matt Ball, co-author of Colorado > > OS Age Attestation Bill SB26-051. > >=20 > > Sen. Ball suggested excluding open source software from the bill. > > This appears to be a real possibility. > >=20 > > Amendments are expected for the CA age attestation bill. It's my > > hope we can move fast enough to influence excluding open source in > > the CA bill amendments. > >=20 > > No illusions, it's an uphill battle, but we have an open door to > > advocate for the open source community. =20 >=20 > At this time, we are seeing what kinds of changes might be made to > these laws before they become effective. I would not generally advise > working on any technical solution when the laws are ambiguous and > likely to be amended. In the best case, although I believe it is > unlikely, open-source operating systems would not have any work to do > at all. In the worst case, different jurisdictions may have > conflicting laws. >=20 > We and our users greatly value our privacy, and I would hope not to > see over-eager work on a technical implementation that is heavy > handed and potentially jurisdiction specific. We at System76 are also > awaiting the legal opinions of other operating systems, like Ubuntu, > and those would likely be valuable to all potentially affected > operating systems. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 --Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQS8QsiCjFi4DcDBX+Q5rdye4jrrCAUCaa997QAKCRA5rdye4jrr CFvhAP0dhbDaMPtqWI5OqiND4dBReEqrUjhjkfITTSrSxgTgTgEAg1jhuRSupZCp hx82lBAPHzQ9L7D1luh0mlOfrFvw9AE= =wbEn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By--