Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states

Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:11:57 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel,gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 09 Mar 2026 19:39:52 -0600
"Jeremy Soller" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>=20
> My name is Jeremy Soller, and I am Principal Engineer at System76. We
> released a statement on Age Verification laws last Thursday that you
> can read here:
>=20
> https://blog.system76.com/post/system76-on-age-verification
>=20
> Our Founder and CEO, Carl Richell, was able to get a meeting with
> Senator Matt Ball today to discuss the Colorado version of the
> California bill, SB26-051. His statements after the meeting are as
> follows:
>=20
> https://floss.social/@[email protected]/116201429734101067

Wow, this is great to see! Thank you (both you and Carl) for doing
this, and for letting us know!

--
Aaron

> > Today, I met with Colorado Senator Matt Ball, co-author of Colorado
> > OS Age Attestation Bill SB26-051.
> >=20
> > Sen. Ball suggested excluding open source software from the bill.
> > This appears to be a real possibility.
> >=20
> > Amendments are expected for the CA age attestation bill. It's my
> > hope we can move fast enough to influence excluding open source in
> > the CA bill amendments.
> >=20
> > No illusions, it's an uphill battle, but we have an open door to
> > advocate for the open source community. =20
>=20
> At this time, we are seeing what kinds of changes might be made to
> these laws before they become effective. I would not generally advise
> working on any technical solution when the laws are ambiguous and
> likely to be amended. In the best case, although I believe it is
> unlikely, open-source operating systems would not have any work to do
> at all. In the worst case, different jurisdictions may have
> conflicting laws.
>=20
> We and our users greatly value our privacy, and I would hope not to
> see over-eager work on a technical implementation that is heavy
> handed and potentially jurisdiction specific. We at System76 are also
> awaiting the legal opinions of other operating systems, like Ubuntu,
> and those would likely be valuable to all potentially affected
> operating systems.
>=20
> Thank you,
>=20


--Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQS8QsiCjFi4DcDBX+Q5rdye4jrrCAUCaa997QAKCRA5rdye4jrr
CFvhAP0dhbDaMPtqWI5OqiND4dBReEqrUjhjkfITTSrSxgTgTgEAg1jhuRSupZCp
hx82lBAPHzQ9L7D1luh0mlOfrFvw9AE=
=wbEn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/vARksQj97w54jB=dE8do.By--