Re: Porteus, que

Charley Bay <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.zynot.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > charley bay wrote:
> > > * Ability to define a 'que' or 'bundle' <snip>
 
Daniel Armyr replied:
> Oh, was that what you meant with the above. When I
> heard the word queue, I thought about the ability to
> queue up ebuilds while one is building. The
> situation would be as follows:
> I start emerging ebuild1, a very large ebuild
> I realise I also want ebuild2.
> I tell emerge to emerge ebuild2 as soon as ebuild1
> is done.
> The next day I have both ebuild1 and ebuild2
> installed.

Yes!  I want that!  Gimme, gimme, gimme!  ;-)

That actually describes the case that triggered my
post, and I think it could be useful.  I wouldn't
care if the ebuilds were concurrent or not, and
concurrent ebuilds may be complicated with some
dependencies.

--charley


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com