Re: Versioning scheme ?

--===============47058116971496444==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-8yEMXK+/5YGVdKdEZSPe"


--=-8yEMXK+/5YGVdKdEZSPe
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 01:15, Jesse Nelson wrote:
>  Im working on the zyCD and a bit on march stager.. as well this leads
> to me needing to muck with the x86 profile so i can build a stage and
> eventually a Zynot based liveCD ( zyCD :D ) .. =20
>=20
> basically my question for discussion is are we gonna stick to the gentoo
> nameing convention for release versions?  It seems kinda ad-hoc on the
> gentoo side:
>=20
>    stage1-arch-1.4_rc4  <-- stage tarball=20
>    default-x86-1.4 <-- profile
>    portage-2.0.48-r5 <-- package manager=20
>=20
> Basically i think we should simplify on 1 versioning scheme and try to
> perpetuate that throught:=20
> =20
>    stage1-arch-0.1.1  <-- stage
>    server-x86-0.1.1   <-- profile
>    porteus-0.1.1  <-- package manager=20
<snip>

I like this idea, and I think we need a draft for a policy on it.
Perhaps there's an official kernel version policy we could borrow from?

Graham

--=-8yEMXK+/5YGVdKdEZSPe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/VhbhAuxgtoh9rPYRAkD8AKDz82I5QYefJa9n/imgD/RciBIEAwCfQP2K
FOU3LO4g6fmblfbRwuFXUH8=
=y0GT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-8yEMXK+/5YGVdKdEZSPe--


--===============47058116971496444==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
zynot-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zynot.org/mailman/listinfo/zynot-dev

--===============47058116971496444==--