Re: requirement list for porteus-0.5
Mark Gordon <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:46:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.zynot.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Not very often |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07 Jul 2003 14:44:18 -0500 Jon Nall <[email protected]> wrote: > or "What I'd like to see us get done by LWESF". > > Below is a list of the criteria against which I would like to measure > porteus-0.5. This list has been created with the thought that we want > something to show people at LinuxWorldExpo in August. Porteus-0.5 will > be based on the current Python implementation of portage. > > Why version 0.5? Because we don't have time to do everything I think > we should have for a 1.0 release. > > Features: > > * support for syncing to the zynot tree layout via rsync According to your plan this should be up and running now. Although I suppose no change is required since you can just edit make.conf. > * support for syncing multiple tree overlays and logic to > resolve > conflicts when more than one overlay provides a package (see > algorithm in this thread: > http://forums.zynot.org/viewtopic.php?t=225) This facility could be used to allow people to use both the Gentoo and Zynot (or whatever) portage trees until Zynot is up and running with maintenance of everything. Let me guess, that was already the plan? > * 100% API documentation in "PyDoc format" > * a (possibly primitive) test harness in place and 100% line > coverage > * a HOWTO for installing [insert our distro name here] (this is > really an item for the docs folks, but I think it should be a > requirement). Include documentation on how to run both Zynot and Gentoo trees simultaneously. > Please see the link below for a tentative roadmap/schedule > http://wiki.zynot.org/zynot/moin.cgi/PackageManagerRoadmap > > Comments and questions are welcome. I don't know python and I'm forever short of time. However, I would be happy to test porteous and help review the installation guide. -- Mark Gordon Paid to be a Geek & a Senior Software Developer Although my email address says spamtrap, it is real and I read it.