Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Pac <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:55:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.zynot.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 18/12/03 =E0 20:43, Frantz Dhin a =E9crit: Frantz> Hello, Frantz> There is one advantage of a strongly typed schema that I can thin= k of. It is Frantz> the intention that xbuilds should be able to import directly into= a Frantz> relational database management system. We make this a more predic= table Frantz> endeavor by using a strongly typed format since database tables a= nd cells Frantz> are also "strongly typed" and can have limitations on number of c= hars and so Frantz> forth. It is easier for a dba to know what to expect when he star= ts using Frantz> Xeta in a rdbms that we might not have thought of supporting if h= e has a Frantz> schema in hand. Frantz> Regards Frantz> Frantz Dhin I agree with you. relational databases need strong typing. So should I definitively port the DTD to a XML-Schema ? See you