Zynot license (was Re: draft legal ideas)

--===============31608611591285429==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.w(73z:OTpQg8Ij"

--=.w(73z:OTpQg8Ij
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Once upon a time Gareth Buxton tapped upon the keyboard...

> My vote would be for GPL only (with possible addition of LGPL or
> GPL + link exception) and no commercial nonsense.

I would also favour a GPL.

If the chosen license is GPL/LGPL, it should be specified as a
specific version of the GPL, and the "..and any later version."
clauses in the (L)GPL removed, as some people have concerns that
"..and any later version" means that the FSF could release a new
version of the (L)GPL that remove some of the rights given by the
current versions.

 Michael.

-- 
m.martucci_gmx.net  o__     o__     o__     o__     o__  
s/_/@/              ,>/'_   ,>/'_   ,>/'_   ,>/'_   ,>/'_  
                   (*)\(*) (*)\(*) (*)\(*) (*)\(*) (*)\(*) 
http://studentsofsustainability.org.au/   .   .  . ...Ride a Bike!


--=.w(73z:OTpQg8Ij
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/OE6VLnFTBPzQJwsRAsA8AJ0bfWeXLkut8PgpYLaaptvz84Px2ACfXlXc
X+VpkfDLA/wntPZiOY2mcf0=
=NFOJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.w(73z:OTpQg8Ij--

--===============31608611591285429==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Zynaut mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zynot.org/mailman/listinfo/zynaut

--===============31608611591285429==--