Re: Requirment Specification

heh I made my contribution to a spec Idea :/

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 12:40, David Nielsen wrote:
> Jesse I think that was an encouragement to the true paranoids amongst us
> to make a contribution to teach all us other poor suckers how it's
> done...
> 
> - David
> 
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 21:14, Jesse Nelson wrote:
> > i see no mention of security at all on this spec :(  
> > 
> > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 11:28, Graham Forest wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 06:00, Gareth Buxton wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Now is the time to make any final requests for functionality of the
> > > > package manager. By this I mean the core system and not the user
> > > > interface. It's also an opportunity for the powers that be (zach et al.)
> > > > to accept/reject/prioritize ideas in this list.
> > > <snip>
> > > 
> > > It was kind of hinted at with the simultanious source->derived package
> > > requirement, but don't forget the all-important simultanious
> > > download/compilation. More generically, it's not ideal to have your
> > > processor waiting on non-processor intensive tasks.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Graham
> > > 
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > zynaut mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.zynot.org/mailman/listinfo/zynaut
> > Pushing 30 is exercise enough.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > zynaut mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.zynot.org/mailman/listinfo/zynaut
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zynaut mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zynot.org/mailman/listinfo/zynaut
Fortune finishes the great quotations, #12 Those who can, do. Those who
can't, write the instructions.