Re: Issues

Mark Guertin <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:47:38 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.zynot.zynaut
Message-ID <BB30B439.7C5%[email protected]>
On 7/8/03 5:43 PM, "Zach Welch" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ideally, we want *one* tool for everything.  Tikiwiki seems the best
> thing so far, and I would rather see the community throw its weight
> behind one tool than a number of them.  I even know the bugzilla
> configuration process and internal code base and would rather sacrifice
> that in the short term for the long term ease of use.
> 
> In that regard, it seems that we could cut back significantly on
> independent services using tikiwiki, so it still seems like the best
> total solution for our needs.  Thoughts?

I have a bit of reservation on using tikiwiki for bug tracking as well in
the long term.  I have yet to see a system that has adequate bug tracking
for a large project AND is usable for other things.

For now I think it would be fine stand alone, but if/when bugs start rolling
in I think it may be unavoidable to go with a full blown Mozilla setup.  I
guess time will tell, but I'm sure we will outgrow the capabilities in
tikiwiki once things are rolling.

There is a great bugzilla for large projects talk at OLS, so maybe we'll
have to schedule that one into things ;)

Mark