Re: Issues
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:47:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.zynot.zynaut |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BB30B439.7C5%[email protected]> |
On 7/8/03 5:43 PM, "Zach Welch" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ideally, we want *one* tool for everything. Tikiwiki seems the best > thing so far, and I would rather see the community throw its weight > behind one tool than a number of them. I even know the bugzilla > configuration process and internal code base and would rather sacrifice > that in the short term for the long term ease of use. > > In that regard, it seems that we could cut back significantly on > independent services using tikiwiki, so it still seems like the best > total solution for our needs. Thoughts? I have a bit of reservation on using tikiwiki for bug tracking as well in the long term. I have yet to see a system that has adequate bug tracking for a large project AND is usable for other things. For now I think it would be fine stand alone, but if/when bugs start rolling in I think it may be unavoidable to go with a full blown Mozilla setup. I guess time will tell, but I'm sure we will outgrow the capabilities in tikiwiki once things are rolling. There is a great bugzilla for large projects talk at OLS, so maybe we'll have to schedule that one into things ;) Mark