Re: regexp confusion
Edi Weitz <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:22:29 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.allegro |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:07:56 +0100, Laurent Eschenauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Did anyone try the benchmark of CL-PPCRE on ACL ? > > I just tried the benchmark on ACL 6.2 and CMUCL and was shocked by > the results ! Either ACL is awfully slow or I am missing > something. Anyone tried something similar ? > > ACL 6.2: > $mlisp > cl-user(1): (load "load.lisp") > cl-user(2): (cl-ppcreptest:test :file-name "timedata") > > 1: 4.0115 (1000000 repetitions, Perl: 3.4945 seconds, CL-PPCRE: 14.0180 seconds) > 2: 2.9020 (1000000 repetitions, Perl: 3.8404 seconds, CL-PPCRE: 11.1450 seconds) > > CMU-CL: > $lisp > * (load "load.lisp") > * (cl-ppcreptest:test :file-name "timedata") > 1: 0.5637 (1000000 repetitions, Perl: 3.4945 seconds, CL-PPCRE: 1.9700 seconds) > 2: 0.4296 (1000000 repetitions, Perl: 3.8404 seconds, CL-PPCRE: 1.6500 seconds) > > Any insight on this would be appreciated ! Well, I developed CL-PPCRE using CMUCL and optimized it using CMUCL compiler messages. I'll happily accept patches to make it faster on other Lisps. I wouldn't say that Allegro is awfully slow but rather that CMUCL is extremely fast in some cases. Edi.