Re: [spr35301] make-<some-struct> performance

Didier Verna <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:58:20 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.allegro
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Duane Rettig wrote:

> the spec clearly allows Allegro CL's behavior (the defstruct
> description page is rife with nods to the implementation, and the term
> "implementation dependent" appears in both slot-option descriptions).

  Yup.

=20
> If your comment was just an observation, then I would say that yes, we
> do the same high-optimization building of structs under all
> circumstances when it comes to slot options, and thus I would expect
> our make-<struct> constructors to generally be at the top end in terms
> of speed.

  Okay, that's perfectly fine with me. This is what I suspected, and
yes, I was only making an observation, and trying to confirm my
hypothesis.

Thanks for the reply !

--=20
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.

Scientific site:   http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com

EPITA/LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bic=EAtre, France
Tel. +33 (0)1 44 08 01 85       Fax. +33 (0)1 53 14 59 22