[ cclan-Bugs-437891 ] Package naming not following policy

Bugs item #437891, was opened at 2001-07-02 15:03
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=393636&aid=437891&group_id=28536

Category: Other
Group: policy violation
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 2
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Peter Van Eynde (pvaneynd)
Summary: Package naming not following policy

Initial Comment:
The memoization, series and quick-array packages don't
really follow the naming policy (they're not final
applications, so they really ought to have cl- or
clocc- prefixes.

This is not as grave as it might be because the main
reason we have the naming policy is to avoid clashes
with real debian packages (e.g. imho); since the above
_are_ real debian packages it isn't a problem.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Peter Van Eynde (pvaneynd)
Date: 2003-02-03 12:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=7267

Packages have new names in unstable, will ask for removal of
old packages when they are all in testing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stig E Sandø (stig)
Date: 2001-07-02 20:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=9857

This seems to be Peter's packages.  Also lowered the
priority.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=393636&aid=437891&group_id=28536


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com