Re: ASDF: alternative system configurations
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9 Apr 2003, Marco Baringer wrote:
> what's wrong with:
>
> :components ((:file "render" #+cl-sdl :depends-on #+cl-sdl ("window"))
> #+cl-sdl(:file "window"))
It seems that CL-SDL does not add itself to *features*, and pushing it
there manually doesn't seem much of an improvement over two systems...
> for more complex things it helps to define modules and condititonally
> include those.
Could you give an example? I have a hunch that in the future I will be
depending on the presence of a lot of things, but can actually do without
most of them...
Thanks,
-- Nikodemus
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com