Experimental new asdf version and cvs tagging scheme
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a heads-up to asdf users: as from 1.28, the HEAD release is no longer guaranteed to be the `stable' version. If you want the stable version, there is a new tag RELEASE: you can get this by doing "cvs up -r RELEASE" instead of just "cvs up". The stable version is hoped to be the same thing as the HEAD most of the time, but right now it's not. Some minimal standard of workingness will continue to be applied to the HEAD in that it is still expected to pass tests etc before checkin, but if you have big systems that depend on asdf working, you may be safer with the RELEASE Now then. There were some nasty inefficiences in the 1.27 and earlier revisions of asdf that manifested themselves as very slow operation on large systems that had minimal or no changes: I'm indebted to Stig Sandoe for bringing them to my attention - and his project langband for being a system that exhibits these problems that I can get the source to. The fix is about two lines, and so obvious (once the problem was identified) that I'm worried there might be some reason for not having done it that way originally. It passes the tests, for what that's worth. It also builds langband (and rebuilds are substantially faster, I might add). It works as far as I can find, in fact, but I'd love to hear from you if it doesn't work on your systems. Remember, if you have the time to test it, you now also have the wherewithal to easily back it out :-) The HEAD version now also has some more compiler warning cleanups, for which many thanks to Miles Egan -dan -- http://ww.telent.net/cliki/ - Link farm for free CL-on-Unix resources _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink