Re: asdf-install and pgp

Edi Weitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cclan.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> writes:

> [ this email goes to cclan-list because packaging and installation
> tools are the kind of thing it's about, and to Miles and Edi
> personally because they now have asdf-installable versions of their
> software packages linked fron CLiki ]
> 
> If we are to automatically download and run code from
> freely-editable links on the internet, I think that some form of
> authentication of the code is required, and PGP to verify the source
> is a good place to start.  It does open up a whole "who do you
> trust" can of worms, though, in that the effort you might once have
> spent finding sources you now have to spend getting and verifying
> PGP keys
> 
> I've just retrieved Miles' key from the keyservers 
> 
>   pub  1024/01F53D51 2002-06-04            
> 	   Fingerprint=E323 24E0 932E 9419 797E D8B3 5382 6AFF 01F5 3D51 
> 
> (not the same key as is posted on the SBCL web page for him,
> incidentally) and it matches all the PGP-signed mail I've had from
> him over the past few months , so I'm thinking that probably merits
> a "(2) I have done casual checking" signature.  (I reserve (3) for
> physical meeting with proof of id).  I don't think that approach
> scales, though, and it's certainly not much good for new users
> 
> Any ideas?  One thought that occurs to me is that there seem to be
> Debian developers in many places; if we could all get keys signed by
> well-connected Debian developers, that might join the dots between
> us a bit.  Still doesn't solve the new-user problem, though

No ideas, currently. I just wanted to say that I've read about
asdf-install today and think it's a good thing, that's why I made an
asdf-install link for CL-PPCRE.

Actually, I didn't have a key yet and just generated one for this
purpose. I'm open to all solutions but (a) I'm not a Debian developer
and (b) I think I haven't met anyone involved in CCLAN physically.

One other thing: I just noted that you seem to use '_' (underline) to
separate the name of the package from its version number. I currently
use '-' (hyphen) - does that mean it won't work if I release a new
package? No problem for me to switch to '_' but I'll have to ask Kevin
if it breaks his Debian package.

Cheers,
Edi.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.