Re: asdf-install and pgp
Edi Weitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> writes: > [ this email goes to cclan-list because packaging and installation > tools are the kind of thing it's about, and to Miles and Edi > personally because they now have asdf-installable versions of their > software packages linked fron CLiki ] > > If we are to automatically download and run code from > freely-editable links on the internet, I think that some form of > authentication of the code is required, and PGP to verify the source > is a good place to start. It does open up a whole "who do you > trust" can of worms, though, in that the effort you might once have > spent finding sources you now have to spend getting and verifying > PGP keys > > I've just retrieved Miles' key from the keyservers > > pub 1024/01F53D51 2002-06-04 > Fingerprint=E323 24E0 932E 9419 797E D8B3 5382 6AFF 01F5 3D51 > > (not the same key as is posted on the SBCL web page for him, > incidentally) and it matches all the PGP-signed mail I've had from > him over the past few months , so I'm thinking that probably merits > a "(2) I have done casual checking" signature. (I reserve (3) for > physical meeting with proof of id). I don't think that approach > scales, though, and it's certainly not much good for new users > > Any ideas? One thought that occurs to me is that there seem to be > Debian developers in many places; if we could all get keys signed by > well-connected Debian developers, that might join the dots between > us a bit. Still doesn't solve the new-user problem, though No ideas, currently. I just wanted to say that I've read about asdf-install today and think it's a good thing, that's why I made an asdf-install link for CL-PPCRE. Actually, I didn't have a key yet and just generated one for this purpose. I'm open to all solutions but (a) I'm not a Debian developer and (b) I think I haven't met anyone involved in CCLAN physically. One other thing: I just noted that you seem to use '_' (underline) to separate the name of the package from its version number. I currently use '-' (hyphen) - does that mean it won't work if I release a new package? No problem for me to switch to '_' but I'll have to ask Kevin if it breaks his Debian package. Cheers, Edi. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.