Re: ASDF vs. logical pathnames in CMUCL
Kevin Rosenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general,gmane.lisp.cmucl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Christopher C. Stacy wrote: > At this point, I must repeat my call to anyone who is using ASDF. > (So far only one person has answered, saying that they don't think it > works with logical pathnames!) I was under the impression that many I've used ASDF for the last several years. when I first started integrating ASDF in Common Lisp Controller, I found that ADSF did not support logical pathnames well. With that finding, CLC has moved away from logical pathnames. > How is anyone else loading UFFI and CL-SQL ? I know there are users. I use it every day, I just don't use logical pathnames. Instead, I have a directory of symlinks to the .asd files and I push that directory's pathname onto asdf:*central-registry* in my Lisp initialization files. -- Kevin Rosenberg [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3