Re: What is the recommended package for ASD files?
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pascal J.Bourguignon <[email protected]> writes: > Peter Seibel writes: >> I've seen folks define a package that uses ASDF and I've seen folks >> say (in-package :asdf) at the top of their .asd file. Which is better >> style? (It sort of seems like there ought to be an ASDF-USER package >> that reexports all the public symbols from ASDF but maybe that's >> overkill.) > > On the contrary, I find it would be better to have a ASDF-USER than to > use ASDF, and slightly better to have a ASDF-USER than to define a > *-SYSTEM package for each system loaded. I forget, but does asdf not itself define a scratch package for reading into? This doesn't cater for interactive redefinition, but it does have certain other desireable properties, I guess. Mind you, it would appear that said package is never deleted, so... maybe that's not so good after all. :-) (Dan, are you listening?) Cheers, Christophe -- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285